Difference between revisions of "Example Skeleton Arguments"
From Learnmore
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
'''Huge''' thanks to ''Samuel Phillips, Edward Waldegrave, Beatrice Riley'' and ''Gareth Thomas'' for allowing us to use their skeletons to help you! | '''Huge''' thanks to ''Samuel Phillips, Edward Waldegrave, Beatrice Riley'' and ''Gareth Thomas'' for allowing us to use their skeletons to help you! | ||
− | *[ | + | *[https://lawbore.net/articles/Senior_appellant.pdf Senior Appellant] |
− | *[ | + | *[https://lawbore.net/articles/Senior_respondent.pdf Senior Respondent] |
− | *[ | + | *[https://lawbore.net/articles/Junior_respondent.pdf Junior Respondent] |
− | *[ | + | *[https://lawbore.net/articles/Junior_appellant.pdf Junior Appellant] |
[[Category:Mooting]] | [[Category:Mooting]] | ||
[[Category: Section 4]] | [[Category: Section 4]] |
Latest revision as of 14:22, 11 October 2024
Learn from the Skeleton Masters!
We are lucky enough to have each of the four skeleton arguments submitted for the Final of the Crown Offices Chambers Moot 2010 at The City Law School. Check out the Example Moot Problem to see what they are responding to.
You'll see that the format and approach is in no way identical.
Huge thanks to Samuel Phillips, Edward Waldegrave, Beatrice Riley and Gareth Thomas for allowing us to use their skeletons to help you!