Difference between revisions of "Example Skeleton Arguments"
From Learnmore
(New page: We are lucky enough to have each of the four skeleton arguments submitted for the Final of the Crown Offices Chambers Moot 2010 at The City Law School. Check out the Example Moot Problem ...) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Learn from the Skeleton Masters!== | ||
We are lucky enough to have each of the four skeleton arguments submitted for the Final of the Crown Offices Chambers Moot 2010 at The City Law School. Check out the Example Moot Problem to see what they are responding to. | We are lucky enough to have each of the four skeleton arguments submitted for the Final of the Crown Offices Chambers Moot 2010 at The City Law School. Check out the Example Moot Problem to see what they are responding to. | ||
| Line 9: | Line 11: | ||
| − | [http://lawbore.net/articles/Senior_appellant Senior Appellant] | + | *[http://lawbore.net/articles/Senior_appellant Senior Appellant] |
| − | [http://lawbore.net/articles/Senior_respondent Senior Respondent] | + | *[http://lawbore.net/articles/Senior_respondent Senior Respondent] |
| − | [http://lawbore.net/articles/Junior_respondent Junior Respondent] | + | *[http://lawbore.net/articles/Junior_respondent Junior Respondent] |
| − | [http://lawbore.net/articles/Junior_appellant Junior Appellant] | + | *[http://lawbore.net/articles/Junior_appellant Junior Appellant] |
[Category:Mooting] | [Category:Mooting] | ||
Revision as of 22:07, 17 September 2010
Learn from the Skeleton Masters!
We are lucky enough to have each of the four skeleton arguments submitted for the Final of the Crown Offices Chambers Moot 2010 at The City Law School. Check out the Example Moot Problem to see what they are responding to.
You'll see that the format and approach is in no way identical.
Huge thanks to Samuel Phillips, Edward Waldegrave, Beatrice Riley and Gareth Thomas for allowing us to use their skeletons to help you!
[Category:Mooting]